<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another take on science fiction&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediavorous.com/archives/another-take-on-science-fiction/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediavorous.com/archives/another-take-on-science-fiction</link>
	<description>A blog about where culture, new media, marketing and community collide... in people's heads.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hespos</title>
		<link>http://mediavorous.com/archives/another-take-on-science-fiction/comment-page-1#comment-20501</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hespos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediavorous.com/archives/another-take-on-science-fiction#comment-20501</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s a great post by Thompson.

I&#039;ve always believed that the best sci-fi is primarily about humanity.  (At least this is what I tell my wife, who hates all things sci-fi.  She doesn&#039;t buy it.)

One of the reasons I love the Star Trek franchise is that it&#039;s not all about explosions, laser beams and creative ways to use antimatter.  It&#039;s about, to paraphrase/steal from Thompson, seeing what happens to humanity after we change the physics in the sim.

What if we could travel faster than light?  How does that change humanity?  What if we could use matter and energy interchangeably (the transporter)?  How does that change how we relate to one another?

So yeah, I&#039;ve been trying and failing to convince Lauren of all of this.  It&#039;s a logically sound argument - if you like all these chick flicks about human interaction, you&#039;ll really dig &quot;The Wrath of Khan.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s a great post by Thompson.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always believed that the best sci-fi is primarily about humanity.  (At least this is what I tell my wife, who hates all things sci-fi.  She doesn&#8217;t buy it.)</p>
<p>One of the reasons I love the Star Trek franchise is that it&#8217;s not all about explosions, laser beams and creative ways to use antimatter.  It&#8217;s about, to paraphrase/steal from Thompson, seeing what happens to humanity after we change the physics in the sim.</p>
<p>What if we could travel faster than light?  How does that change humanity?  What if we could use matter and energy interchangeably (the transporter)?  How does that change how we relate to one another?</p>
<p>So yeah, I&#8217;ve been trying and failing to convince Lauren of all of this.  It&#8217;s a logically sound argument &#8211; if you like all these chick flicks about human interaction, you&#8217;ll really dig &#8220;The Wrath of Khan.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Another take on science fiction…</title>
		<link>http://mediavorous.com/archives/another-take-on-science-fiction/comment-page-1#comment-20499</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Another take on science fiction…</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediavorous.com/archives/another-take-on-science-fiction#comment-20499</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

